Filter This
This article first appeared on Network World, by IDG contributor Brent Dietz.
Connected devices must transmit cellular signals, Wi-Fi,
Bluetooth and GPS across multiple frequency bands while avoiding interference.
We might immediately think of smartphones, but the same is true of shark fins mounted
atop a car’s roof, cellular base
stations, radar and
communications
systems, and industrial,
scientific or medical applications connected to the Internet of Things
(IoT). This is where filters come in.
With a bunch of frequencies competing for attention, filters allow desired frequencies while rejecting unwanted ones. Put another way, filters are like Gandalf in J.R.R. Tolkien’s “The Lord of the Rings”:
“You shall not pass!”
Devices today contain as many as 30 to 40 filters to combat interference. The situation is likely to become even more complex with next-generation high-end smartphones requiring even more filters.
A smartphone with #nofilter is a paperweight.
Filtering challenges
Filters are an essential tool for RF design engineers, but they also have their challenges. For starters, filter performance varies with temperature. Filters in today’s devices are subject to average temperatures of 60 degrees Celsius (140 degrees Fahrenheit) or greater, while sitting in a room temperature environment of 25 degrees Celsius (77 degrees Fahrenheit). Filters embedded in the shark fin or roof of a car get even hotter.
The hotter the filter, the more difficult it is to isolate certain frequencies — and the more likely it is for signals to “drift” into neighboring frequency bands.
“I’m a big fan of static, white noise, party lines and dropped calls,” said no one, ever.
As more new bands are assigned closer to existing ones, managing temperature drift is critical. We’re also seeing the proliferation of carrier aggregation (CA) where cellular service providers are combining as many as five carrier channels to increase network performance, and precise filtering is a must.
As I mentioned, next-generation high-end smartphones also need more filters. Like everything in RF, there’s a finite amount of real estate for these components. Engineers have had to find ways of combining filters to deliver higher performance in a smaller space.
Enter some of my favorite terms in the RF dictionary.
Duplexers, triplexers, quadplexers — yes, even hexaplexers — are all part of a class of devices called multiplexers. Multiplexers combine multiple filters into a single device, which helps designers save space, simplify design, and meet performance requirements, while avoiding interference.
Wi-Fi presents a final challenge. While some luddites still use smartphones for texting and calling, most of us spend our time browsing the web, streaming videos and posting to social media. LTE and Wi-Fi bands are extremely close together, and left unfiltered, Wi-Fi signals can desensitize LTE reception on a device. Desensitization causes a slew of dreadful things, including dropped or interrupted calls.
For this, we need a special kind of filter.
Coexistence filters allow Wi-Fi and LTE signals to exist in harmony. The name suits them well. These filters reject closely adjacent frequencies, so we can view our friends’ Instagram stories without missing a call from Mom. They’re also important in the connected car, where LTE, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, GPS and vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) must coexist without interference.
Without filters, we’d have quite the wireless traffic jam.
In today’s mobile environment, the number of bands required in one device is staggering — and the trend will only increase as we approach 5G. Supporting all these bands causes interference issues, requiring filters to save the day. Without filters, networking simply doesn’t work.
